Pedagogy
Before Technology
When I first began my public school teaching career, I
was introduced to Bloom’s Taxonomy. It was a way for teachers to understand how
to raise their level of instruction, and consequently their students’ learning.
The taxonomy was divided into six different domain levels: knowledge,
comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The goal of
all teachers was to have their students working at the highest levels possible.
While it was understood that certain aspects of education were naturally taught
at the knowledge and comprehension levels, it was more desirable to have
students working at the levels above those; and, hopefully, reaching the synthesis
and evaluation levels as often as possible.
In the 1990’s the taxonomy was updated to change the
nouns associated with the levels to action verbs to move the education process
to a more active stance, rather than just passive acquisition. Knowledge became
remember, comprehension became understand, etc. Also, the highest two levels
switched places with each other, with the action verb “create” ending up at the
very top.
With
the advent of more technology into our society and schools, the original
Bloom’s Taxonomy has evolved into Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy. (The creator of
Bloom’s Taxonomy isn’t around to see this current version of his taxonomy.
Benjamin Bloom died in 1999.) Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy attaches Web 2.0 tasks
to the basic taxonomy. A task such as simple googling would fall in the
remembering level. More advanced searching such as Boolean searches would be
associated with the understanding level. Digital tasks can be applied to all of
the taxonomic levels. The highest level, creating, would include such digital
activities as website design, blogging, podcasting, etc.
One
of the biggest differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 is the development of
apps, or applications, that help users learn and perform tasks, functions, and
activities. There are apps for every imaginable educational need. As they tell
us on Sesame Street, “There’s an app for that!” When the internet first began
there were few if any apps available for users. I experienced Web 1.0 in its
infancy in the early 1990’s through to its demise/evolution in the early
2000’s. Our students never experienced Web 1.0. Most of them don’t understand
the staticity and lack of interactivity of the early web. For them, the World
Wide Web has always been a place full of apps and the ability to interact with
programs, other humans, and the internet itself. This is one of the differences
between students’ views of technology and many of their teachers, including
myself. I have to constantly remind myself that the things that I take for
granted regarding technology are often fundamentally different from those of my
students. It’s crucial for teachers to understand how students view and use
technology so that instruction can be successful, and learning can be
maximized. We cannot teach the same way that we were taught. We need to teach
the way that students learn best, which is with an eye toward technology,
interactivity, and the use of apps that enhance the teaching process. Technology
is a tool for learning. It will never replace the emotional connection that
exists between great teachers and their students, but it is something that
great teachers can add to their educational toolkits.
School
librarians fill many roles on campuses. Being a leader in the use of technology
is increasingly becoming a crucial aspect of their jobs, to the point now that
terms such as “library” and “librarian” are often replaced with words such as
“tech”, “technology”, and “media.” This makes sense, since the internet itself
can be thought of as the biggest library of all. This is why teaching future
librarians how to use technology and the internet is now a part of any good
librarian preparation program.
As
the internet evolves, so too must all librarians. Continuing professional
development is necessary to stay up-to-date with current changes in technology
and apps. Librarians must be ready to help teachers become conversant with the
changing digital landscape. To do that, librarians themselves have to stay at
the forefront of technological innovation and advancement.
References
App for that. Kathy
Schrock’s Guide to Everything. (n.d.-a). https://www.schrockguide.net/app-for-that.html
Benjamin Bloom. New
World Encyclopedia. (n.d.). https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Benjamin_Bloom
Bloomin’ Apps. Kathy
Schrock’s Guide to Everything. (n.d.). https://www.schrockguide.net/bloomin-apps.html
Bloom’s digital taxonomy
- ccconline. (n.d.). http://www.ccconline.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Churches_2008_DigitalBloomsTaxonomyGuide.pdf
Bloom’s digital taxonomy.
Common Sense Education. (n.d.). https://www.commonsense.org/education/videos/blooms-digital-taxonomy
Bloom’s taxonomy.
Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Blooms-taxonomy
Difference between web
1.0, web 2.0, and web 3.0. Geeks for Geeks. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/web-1-0-web-2-0-and-web-3-0-with-their-difference/
Marist News: The First
Marist Mindset List is released. Marist College. (n.d.). https://www.marist.edu/w/marist-news-the-first-marist-mindset-list-is-released
Sesame street: Song:
There’s an app for that. YouTube. (2010, November 1). https://youtu.be/EhkxDIr0y2U
Tools and resources to
drive your technology initiatives. K. (n.d.). https://www.k12blueprint.com/toolkits
Hello Mr. Bower,
ReplyDeleteI really like the way you mentioned, technology will never replace the emotional connection that exists between great teachers and their students, but it is something that great teachers can add to their educational toolkits. Technology could not replace the social emotional aspect of learning and the strong connections that teachers have with their students. We are reminded of this from the pandemic.
Hi Barbara! Do you go by Barbara or Barb? Please call me Gilbert. Yes, I agree with you that what happened with education during the pandemic reinforces the importance of the connection between students and teachers, especially when they're together in the classroom or library. Thank you for your comment!
DeleteHi Gilbert,
ReplyDeleteFirstly, I love your Sesame Street reference!
Your point about how we can't teach the way we were taught hits home. It's so challenging to truly innovate our teaching practices when it's so significantly different from the way that we were taught and trained. The responsibilities of librarians and educators to not only learn about the evolving technology but to integrate it into practice is a challenging but worthwhile endeavor, as evidenced by your point that the titles "librarian" and "media specialist" are synonymous.
Thank you for your thoughts!
Casandra Jackson
Hi Casey! I hadn't seen that particular Sesame Street video until I saw it in our readings. It was so funny I just had to mention it. I agree with your comments regarding teaching practices. We do have to move forward with the times. Nonetheless, I will always consider "librarian" a more preferable title than "media specialist." Call me old-fashioned... Ha!
DeleteHi Gilbert,
ReplyDeleteI really like your statement "we need to teach the way that students learn best." This is truly something we must always keep in mind in order to help our students succeed. Great post!
-Brenda